000			01890nam a22002777a 4500
999			_c10462 _d10462
003			PILC
005			20240720152949.0
008			180207b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_cFEU-NRMF MEDICAL LIBRARY
041			_aEnglish
050			_aM PATH ND 0004
100			_aDr. Remedios A. Magkasi _eadviser
245			_aA Comparison Between Morning Midstream Urine Sample and Afternoon Midstream Urine Sample for Routine Urinalysis / _cRommel R. Bayot ; Anthony G. Jao and Pamela M. Mortos.
260			_aManila _bDepartment of Pathology, FEU-NRMF _cND
300			_a19 pages: _billustrations, tables, photos; _c28 cm.
336			_2rdacontent _atext
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume
504			_aIncludes appendices and bibliographical references.
520			_aAbstract: The reliability of non fasting afternoon midstream urine as an alternative sample for morning midstream urine sample for routine urinalysis was studied. Non-fasting morning and afternoon midstream urine sample, submitted by the 38 Filipino subjects who consented, were subjected to a routine urinalysis. There was no significant difference in the physical and chemical examination between the morning and afternoon urine specimen and using a two tailed, paired z test (p-alpha = 0.05) it was found out that there was also no significant difference in the microscopic finding between the morning and afternoon urine except in the number of RBC counted per hpf. Therefore it can be said that a non-fasting afternoon midstream urine sample is as reliable as non-fasting morning midstream urine sample in the macroscopic chemical and microscopic examination except in the microscopic examination in RBC.
521			_ailmu penyakit
700			_aBayot, Rommel R. _eauthor
700			_aJao, Anthony G. _eauthor
700			_aMortos, Pamela M. _eauthor
942			_2lcc _cTH