000			02098nam a22002897a 4500
001			MT 2021 0001
003			PILC
005			20241021134444.0
008			210721b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_beng _cFEU-NRMF MEDICAL LIBRARY _erda
041			_aenglish
050			_aMT 2021 0001
111			_eMLS RICO 2021
245			_aA Systematic analysis on utilizing other body specimens for re-examination of SARS CoV-2 / _cAira Trisha G. Dy Guaso and Denise Allison S. Ramacho.
260			_aFairview, Quezon City: _bSchool of Medical Technology, FEU-NRMF, _c2021.
300			_a46 pages: _btables, photos; _c28 cm.
336			_2rdacontent _atext
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume
504			_aIncludes appendices and bibliographic references.
520			_aAbstract: This study sought to identify other non-invasive specimens aside from the current gold standard, nasopharyngeal swabs. As stated by Mathuria et al. (2020), early yet reliable and accurate diagnosis is very crucial in preventing the spread of virus, and providing medical help. However, recent studies about cases of false negatives have emerged with Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR testing using the gold standard specimens. A systematic review of articles from PubMed, Google Scholar, and BioMed Central was done in order to assess the possibility of using other non-invasive specimens for re-examinations performed on recovering COVID-19 patients. 19 screened and eligible studies were included in this systematic analysis. From the articles, fecal specimens, anal and rectal swab specimens, Dried Blood Spot samples, posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples, and throat wash samples were suggested to use as non-invasive specimen for re-examination of SARS-CoV-2.
521			_aTHMT
700			_aDy Guaso, Aira Trisha G. _eauthor
700			_aRamacho, Denise Allison S. _eauthor
856			_21 _30 _qpdf _uhttps://library.feu-nrmf.ph/cgi-bin/koha/opac-retrieve-file.pl?id=d688517839c960af4936a2a99bccaba0 _yClick here for FULL TEXT _1ALL
942			_2lcc _cRU
999			_c11948 _d11948