000 03650nam a22003377a 4500
999 _c12236
_d12236
001 PT 2020 0006
003 PILC
005 20240720153239.0
008 220404b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _beng
_cFEU-NRMF MEDICAL LIBRARY
_erda
041 _aenglish
050 _aPT 2020 0006
245 _aInterrater reliability test of digitalized telescoping goniometer to measure actice range of motion of selected large joints among health individuals /
_cNadine Aguilar, Neil Alamillo, John Ambag, Raiviel Ambrocio, Jessa Buenagua, Pamela Caguiat; Er Dador Petil; Kenneth Mutia.
260 _aFairview, Quezon City:
_bSchool of Physical Therapy, FEU-NRMF,
_c2020.
300 _a46 pages:
_billustrations, tables, photos;
_c28 cm.
336 _2rdacontent
_atext
337 _2rdamedia
_aunmediated
338 _2rdacarrier
_avolume
504 _aIncludes appendices and bibliographical references.
520 _aAbstract: The digitalized telescoping goniometer is an innovative tool to measure range of motions in the shoulder, elbow, hip, and knee wherein errors of measurements are diminished, such as determining the values through visual estimation and assuming landmark placement, which is essential to achieve accurate measurements. The aim of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability of the digitalized telescoping goniometer in measuring active range of motion of selected Large Joints among Healthy Individuals. A total of 10 students from the school of Physical Therapy were chosen as participants for the pilot test was done to establish the reliability of the device in measuring AROM of shoulder, elbow, hip, and knee joints. A total of 25 healthy individuals within legal age from the Future Point 3 Condominium were conveniently chosen as the participants wherein their AROM of Shoulder, Elbow, Hip and Knee joints were assessed with both the digitalized telescoping goniometer and universal goniometer for one trial with the measurements of AAOS as the basis. ICC and LOA were used as the statistical tool in measuring the inter-rater reliability of the digitalized telescoping goniometer. The results showed that the Digitalized Telescoping Goniometer was statistically significant with acceptable ICC on seven range of motion; based on the 95% Confidence Interval of ICC, six on Shoulder joint namely: Right Shoulder Flexion, Left Shoulder Adduction, Right and Left Shoulder Internal Rotation, Right and Left Shoulder External Rotation. One on Knee joint namely: Right knee Extension. Poor ICC was recorded on seven ranges of motion namely: Left Shoulder Extension, Left Elbow Flexion, Left Hip Extension, Right Hip Adduction, Right Hip External Rotation and Right Knee Flexion, hence; we accept the null hypothesis on these motions based on the 95% Confidence Interval of ICC while the other remaining 18 months were interpreted as inconclusive for reliability hence; we accept the null on these motions based on the 95%Confidence Interval of ICC. The results indicated that the device was unreliable in measuring Range of Motion. With 25 motions showing poor or inconclusive reliability and only 7 motions showed statistically significant acceptable reliability across the two therapist.
521 _aTHPT
700 _aAguilar, Nadine Eliss M.
_eauthor
700 _aAlamillo, Neil Andrean M.
_eauthor
700 _aAmbag, John
_eauthor
700 _aAmbrocio, Raiviel P.
_eauthor
700 _aBuenagua, Jessa Veronica A.
_eauthor
700 _aCaguiat, Pamela Flor R.
_eauthor
700 _aPetil, Er Dador, PTRP
_eadviser
700 _aMutia, Kenneth PTRP
_eadviser
942 _2lcc
_cRU