000 04415nam a22004577a 4500
003 PILC
005 20240720153331.0
008 240705b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _beng
_cFEU-NRMF MEDICAL LIBRARY
_drda
041 _aeng
050 _aM CFM 2024 0012
100 1 _aAtibagos Jr., Florida
_eauthor
245 0 1 _aA Comparison of outcomes of traditional, problem-based, and outcome-based curriculum in medicine: A systematic review /
_b[author]: Florida Atibagos Jr., Selina Cayl Agoot, Saeeda Almuqahwi, Jeremie Anne Arciaga, Vhea Bartolome, Rosanna Bucag, Othoniel Bungalso Jr. Hannah Agape, Naomi Castillo, Charisse Chavez, Patricia Therese Chiombon, Austine Joy Cui, Red Destacamento, Dominic John Felix, BAstianelle Maurine Gerard Flores, Alyssa Marie Franciscco, Marinel Khyle Gatus, Sarah Alyssa Ibay, Maria Patricia Denille Inciong
260 _aQuezon City, Philippines:
_bFEU-Dr. Nicanor Reyes Medical Foundation Institute of Medicine,
_c2024
300 _c28cm
_a19pages
336 _2rdacontent
_acontent
337 _2rdamedia
_aunmediated
338 _2rdacarrier
_avolume
504 _aIncludes Appendix
520 _aABSTRACT: Background: Medical educators are reevaluating traditional teaching methods in light of concerns about their efficacy in fostering essential skills and lifelong learning values among students. Outcome-based education (OBE) and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) has emerged as promising alternatives, emphasizing problem - solving skills and adult learning principles. However, evidence supporting its superiority over traditional methods remains inconclusive. This systematic review compares outcome-based, traditional, and problem-based curricula in medical education, focusing on their impact on student success and preparedness for clinical practice. Understanding the effectiveness of different educational approaches is crucial for optimizing medical education practices and improving outcomes. This review aims to inform educators and policymakers on the most effective curriculum design for medical schools. Methods: This systematic review included observational studies comparing success/failure rates among medical students in traditional-based, problem-based, and outcome-based curricula. Participants were medical students enrolled in or graduated from medical schools, with no nationality restrictions. Studies comparing the outcomes of students exposed to different curricula were included. Outcomes focused on success/failure rates in licensure exams, residency, fellowship, specialty/subspecialty training, competency, and practice preparedness. Searches were conducted on PubMed and Google Scholar using relevant keywords. Data extraction, screening, and selection were performed independently by six authors, with discrepancies resolved by a seventh author. Results: A total of 411 studies were initially identified, with 406 excluded following review, leaving five studies meeting inclusion criteria. Data collected included experiment details, sample size, exam passing rates, preparedness, and medical competency levels. To determine the statistically significant difference between the three curriculums, a chi-square test was used. Results show that for all the evaluated outcomes, traditional education, OBE, and PBL are statistically different. With regards to medical competency and preparedness for medical practice, PBL is more advantageous than OBE and traditional education. Keywords: Medical education, Traditional Curriculum, Problem-based learning, Outcome-based learning.
521 _azara'at
700 _aAgoot, Selina Cayl
_eauthor
700 _aAlmuqahwi, Saeeda
_eauthor
700 _aArciaga, Jeremie Anne
_eauthor
700 _aBartolome, Vhea
_eauthor
700 _aBucag, Rosanna
_eauthor
700 _aBungalso Jr., Othoniel
_eauthor
700 _aAgape, Hannah
_eauthor
700 _aCastillo, Naomi
_eauthor
700 _aChavez, Charisse
_eauthor
700 _aChiombon, Patricia Therese
_eauthor
700 _aCui, Austine Joy
_eauthor
700 _aDestacamento, Red
_eauthor
700 _aFelix, Dominic John
_eauthor
700 _aFlores, Bastianelle Maurine Gerard
_eauthor
700 _aFranciscco, Alyssa Marie
_eauthor
700 _aGatus, MArinel Khyle
_eauthor
700 _aIbay, Sarah Alyssa
_eauthor
700 _aInciong, Maria Patricia Denille
_eauthor
942 _2lcc
_cTH
999 _c12698
_d12698