000			03652cam a22004458i 4500
001			22391544
003			PILC
005			20240725100708.0
006			m |o d |
007			cr_|||||||||||
008			220110s2022 nju ob 001 0 eng c
010			_a 2021062108
020			_a9781119668473 _q(epdf)
020			_a9781119668497 _q(pdf)
020			_a9781119668497 _q(epub)
020			_z9781119668398 _q(paperback)
040			_aDLC _beng _cDLC _erda
042			_apcc
050	0	0	_aHQ734
082	0	0	_a646.7/8 _223/eng/20220121
245	0	0	_aFamily communication as... : _bexploring metaphors for family communication / _cedited by Jimmie Manning, Jordan Allen, Katherine J Denker.
263			_a2207
264		1	_aHoboken, NJ : _bJohn Wiley & Sons, _c2022.
300			_axix, 229 pages : _bblack and white illustration ; _c25 cm.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520			_a"Before the last half of the twentieth century, the phrase "family communication as relationship" would have struck a reader as unintelligible. Communication between and among family members was neither an object of scientific study nor a focus of individual reflection or cultural analysis. Moreover, according to the Online Etymology Dictionary, the word relationship first appeared in 1744 but was not applied "specifically of romantic or sexual relationships" for another two hundred years. The field of communication made a turn to studying communication in relationships and the family during the late 1960s and 1970s as it abandoned the common but fairly bloodless definition of interpersonal communication as face-to-face communication between two people. Influenced by classic works in family systems theory, such as that by Satir (1972), Watzlawick, Beavin, and Jackson (1967), and Bateson (1972), the field adopted the metaphor of the family as a system of relationships built, maintained, changed, and destabilized through interaction. Within ten years, Galvin and Brommel (1982) had produced a textbook on family communication that could overview the extensive research analyzing patterns of interaction within families. Starting with couple interaction data (Gottman 1979), Gottman (2002) built a strong mathematical model for the metaphors of family interaction presented in the family system theories. Even though the metaphor of family communication as relationship has generated important research directions, some theorists argue that metaphors are imprecise, ambiguous, and therefore have no place in scientific discourse. But language, even much scientific language, is metaphorical because we discuss one thing in terms of another (Lakoff and Johnson 1980). Of course, literal statements (e.g., the cat sits on the mat) are possible but as soon as we move from concrete physical experience to talk about abstractions, we employ metaphor."-- _cProvided by publisher.
521			_aSchool of Psychology
588			_aDescription based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed.
650		0	_aCommunication in families.
700	1		_aManning, Jimmie, _eeditor
700	1		_aAllen, Jordan _c(Assistant professor of communication studies), _eeditor
700	1		_aDenker, Katherine J., _eeditor
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _tFamily communication as... _dHoboken, NJ : John Wiley & Sons, 2022 _z9781119668398 _w(DLC) 2021062107
906			_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2lcc _cBO
999			_c12825 _d12825